


![]()
click here if you do not wish to receive this publication > NO <
This publication is dedicated to & maintained by those of us who really care about this city. We are many --- (and growing stronger with more people joining our ranks everyday). We are the nameless , faceless city, county, state, federal, and corporate taxpaying citizens & workers who are sick of the "good ole boy system" here in Houston, Texas --We were born on 7-30-1999. We are --- married & single-male & female, maintenance worker to Deputy Directors. We are the faceless civil servants who year after year do our job. We are the one's who see the hard earned tax $$s of the citizens in this area used & abused and given away to enrich a few greedy people with each new administration.
![]()
Before we get to the meat of this week's Housnitch, I just want to let you know that Metro has been temporarily derailed. Read the full story at the Houston Chronicle Web site. They have even included a poll on whether Metro should be allowed to build its rail line. Be sure to vote early --- and often.
![]()
"It was thought there wasn't very much effort put in place to make sure the citizens know what we're doing,"

With that statement, Cheryl Dotson tried to explain why Mayor Lee P. Brown
has an office that is WAY over budget, while telling other departments to take a
1% cut in theirs.
Brown
expands communications office staff
Election-year move raises questions of priorities
By MATT
SCHWARTZ
Copyright 2001 Houston Chronicle In a year in which Mayor Lee
Brown has ordered most city departments to cut their budgets, his communications
staff is growing yet again........Their salaries add up
to $494,000, not including benefits.....
Well that's a really good story there Matt, but ya didn't count Cheryl Dotson's newly expanded staff in that equation....Margaret (Meg) Bowers was hired on 10/7/2000 as Cheryl's Administrative Asst. @ $42,120.00. Her husband, Robert had already come on board on April 3rd of 2000 to the tune of $88,286.90 (but the Mayor was already out of money, so he's being paid from Finance & Administration's budget (HEY! didn't the Mayor say that there was no need to add the amendment to the last budget saying that no employee could be paid from another department, "Because the honor system is working?" .... yeah .... right .... lots of Honor here!) And a Mr. Jonathan D. Hill came at about the same time Meg did, actually 10 days later, on 10/17/2000 to the tune of $52,000.00. And let's not forget Ms. Cheryl herself is making $113,220.12.
Housnitch did make a call to Mr. Hill. We wanted to know if he was the same John Hill who was involved in that $893,000 illegal contract that Cheryl received up in DC. He assured us that he in fact not that John Hill & that he was resigning. That he was going back to the private sector. We thanked Mr. Hill and hung up & not 5 minutes later we received a call for Meg Bowers ... (funny how fast they call when they think WE might be on the track of something!) Ms. Bowers wanted to know if SHE could help Housnitch, at the time, I responded that no she couldn't, and asked what had prompted her call. She referred to my call to Mr. Hill. Then she asked me what i had wanted from him, i did explain my question to him & she asked what his response had been. She was told & promptly hung up.
HMMMMMMMMM---"It was thought there wasn't very much effort put in place to make sure the citizens know what we're doing,"
if that truly was the JOB of that bunch up there .... they wouldn't freak out when someone asks questions!!!! and Hey! MAYOR/CHERYL .... we here at HOUSNITCH tell 250,000 people a week JUST WHAT YA'LL ARE DOING!!!!!!
Since we are into telling em....we thought we'd point out that having a HUSBAND/WIFE working in the same dept is AGAINST CITY POLICY!!!!
SOMEBODY HAS TO GO!!!!!!!Ya'll can't be in the same department, or even the same floor.(Now Ms. Cheryl .... go put some SPIN on that. That's what you're hiring up there .... SPIN DRS.)
If you just did your job ..or knew HOW to do your job, you wouldn't need all those people. And it would go a long way if you cleared out all those stooges that are screwing up our Public Works department, and the Idiots who figure the budget!!!
Cheryl
Dotson hired all those people because SHE DOESN'T KNOW WHAT SHE'S DOING
and HOUSNITCH along with the rest of the Media in this city is publishing the REAL
goings on.
![]()
Mayor Brown has been "campaigning" before he's legally allowed to do so.
Being a Democrat Pct. Chair, Housnitch receives all manner of invitations to participate in breakfasts, lunches, community meetings, etc.
Well, we had heard he was campaigning before the law allows it, and being very active in Senate Dist. 6, we accepted an invitation to breakfast this last Saturday, at Merida's restaurant. The invitation said it was to discuss matters of interest, concerning the community. Yes, Lord....the MAYOR's interests were heard LOUD & CLEAR. If this article so far hasn't shown you a contrast in our city governance. We'll point out a few more:
Congress woman Sheila Jackson Lee woke everyone up with a loudly delivered pep talk about how Democrats were alive & well in Houston, in Texas & in Washington. And added how we all needed to continue to support the Mayor. State Senator Mario Gallegos, came in with the same message, and we were all urged to be sure & sign our pledge cards to the Mayor right then.

Then our Mayor himself spoke, and said he was so tired of the
partisan politics being practiced on Council. He recollected as Police
Chief he couldn't remember who was a Democrat/Republican because there wasn't
any partisan bickering. Then he went on to tell the crowd of Democratic pct.
chairs, (and we wondered if it was just an oversight on the Mayor's behalf that
he only invited Democratic Pct. chairs to the breakfast) ... anyway ... Mayor
Brown went on to inform the mostly Hispanic crowd that it was the
"Republicans on council who had taken funds away from their older
neighborhoods, with the tax roll back."
That they were members who had lights & water projects, and streets
repaired, that kept them from getting the funds necessary to fix their older
more needful communities.
He stressed that this was a Republican agenda, pushed by people who had nice neighborhoods & didn't have the needs their neighborhoods did.
He forgot it took some Democrats to put that 8 vote on the record so his wanton spending sprees would stop.
Mayor went on to say ,"I don't think you'll be able to elect a Republican in this city in 2-4 years" . With that, the Mayor began a litany of every thing he had done.
Sue Schecter was in attendance, (Local Chair of the Democratic Party) .... passing out Texas Democratic Party Sustaining Membership Program enrollment applications .... IF THERE IS PARTISAN POLITICS BEING PRACTICED ON COUNCIL ..... THIS MAYOR IS RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF IT & ACTUALLY PERPETUATES IT, AND IS JUST AS GUILTY AS THE ONES HE IS POINTING FINGERS AT.
We weren't allowed a question & answer period, but
Housnitch wondered about the lack of funds in those neighborhoods. John Castillo
has been on Council for 6 years....he's a Democrat. Felix Fraga before him, he's
a Democrat, Lanier as Mayor...he was a Democrat, and Lee himself has had 3 years
in office...he SAYS he's a Democrat. ![]()
Since the Mayor truly is the only one who has control of council agenda ... If he HONESTLY cared about the poorer Hispanic neighborhoods ... it's really HIS decision which CIP projects come up for allocation of CIP monies ... isn't it?
WELL, ISN'T IT???
You will see that the rest of this year .... right up until election day that ALL CIP monies will go to the Black & Brown communities .... and they will get the bulk of the minority contracts too .... but to be HONEST about it ... he didn't do that, during the last campaign, because he didn't have any real competition then. This time around it's rumored more than one DEMOCRAT will challenge him. NOW, he will come to our communities & ask that you help him get the word out on what he has done. Well Mayor....THIS Democratic Pct. Chair, mother of ten, wife of a Mexican National, now American Citizen, HISPANIC ACTIVIST...is more than willing to " make sure the citizens know what you're doing,"
THAT'S more than a campaign PROMISE!!!
ANYBODY BUT BROWN IN 2001!!!!!!!!!!!
![]()
Is public safety the number one issue?
The
IAD investigation concerning the homophobic slurs & treatment given to a
most productive fellow police officer who is gay , and his partner at Central
Division is finished. Housnitch called Lt. John Silva on more than one occasion
to confirm the outcome. On Monday last he promised to call & inform
Housnitch. Ya'll remember how we here in Housnitch reported on this incident in Housnitch
53. Back then the Chief promised us a speedy conclusion....well, it has been
ANYTHING but a speedy conclusion. (and Mayor, with this being an election
year....you better do something FAST!)
Housnitch1
[9:12 PM]: DO
YOU KNOW THE OUTCOME OF THE IAD INVESTIGATION?
)(*&^%
[9:12 PM]: yes
I do
Housnitch1
[9:12 PM]: Sorry
about the caps
Housnitch1
[9:12 PM]: would
you tell me?
Housnitch1
[9:13 PM]: Chief
is angry
at me & has been advised by legal not
to talk with
me anymore
)(*&^%
[9:13 PM]: all
the Sgts got kicked out of Tact. including Garza
Housnitch1
[9:13 PM]: WHY
GARZA?
)(*&^%
[9:13 PM]: Crain
got days off along with the capt.
)(*&^%
[9:14 PM]: none
of the officers got anything
Housnitch1
[9:14 PM]: But
Garza didn't do anything wrong
)(*&^%
[9:14 PM]: 4
officers heard Morgan call Jeff and Alsbrooks
faggots
and nothing
happened to her
Housnitch1
[9:14 PM]: NOTHING
happened to Elizabeth Morgan?
)(*&^%
[9:14 PM]: we
believe she
must be sleeping with
someone in IAD or a friend
of the
Chief
)(*&^%
[9:15 PM]: Nothing
happened to her
Housnitch1
[9:15 PM]: well,
well, well....but why was Gaeza moved?
)(*&^%
[9:15 PM]: we
think she
must have been be
sleeping with
someone else too or had in the past
and they are protecting her. least she tell on them
)(*&^%
[9:16 PM]: we
don't know why Garza was moved
)(*&^%
[9:16 PM]: they
cleaned House
Housnitch1
[9:16 PM]: well,
I'm
going to let the public decide about our
Chief of Police...
)(*&^%
[9:16 PM]: Alsbrooks
is
still on a radar unit
Housnitch1
[9:16 PM]: why?
)(*&^%
[9:16 PM]: Alsbrooks
cannot go back to his
position because the other
officers
who sabotaged his
felony arrests
are still there
)(*&^%
[9:16 PM]: I
wish I
knew
the Answer
Housnitch1
[9:16 PM]: .We
heard they could use good TACT
people
Housnitch1
[9:17 PM]: has
anyone
spoken with Council
member Annise Parker about this?
)(*&^%
[9:17 PM]: No,
I don't think so
)(*&^%
[9:17 PM]: these
homophobes are still policing the Gay
community
)(*&^%
[9:18 PM]: its
a Sad day for the Dept and the
citizens of Houston.
)(*&^%
[9:18 PM]: They
have 2 weeks before the transfer happens
)(*&^%
[9:19 PM]: .
We
cant figure out how 4 officers can say Morgan
called those guys
faggots and nothing Happens
)(*&^%
[9:21 PM]: and
she and her homophobic buddies are still out
making undercover arrests
in the Gay community
)(*&^%
[9:22 PM]: Garza
did the right thing about sticking up for
what's
right and he gets fired..
)(*&^%
[9:22 PM]: We
cant
believe this
)(*&^%
[9:22 PM]: Totally
unfair
Housnitch1
[9:22 PM]: ABSOLUTELY
UNFAIR
Housnitch1
[9:23 PM]: anything
else Housnitch
should know before we start
making phone calls & publishing?
)(*&^%
[9:23 PM]: Garza
is the most dedicated fair,
hard working, by
the book supervisor you have
ever
seen ..
Alsbrooks went above & beyond the call of duty. Him & his partner's
arrest record was 3 times better than any other officer in that squad . this
is a disaster for the good guys
)(*&^%[9:23
PM]: Shows
what Happens when you try to stand up for
what's
right
Housnitch1
[9:24 PM]: do
you have a copy of the outcome?
)(*&^%
[9:24 PM]: No.
there is no copy
Housnitch1
[9:24 PM]: where
is Garza being moved to?
)(*&^%
[9:24 PM]: just
a decision by Lt. Roman
Housnitch1
[9:24 PM]: SOMEBODY
somewhere has a letter about the outcome of
this
investigation
)(*&^%
[9:25 PM]: we
don't
know. probably back to Patrol without OT and weekends
off.
Housnitch1
[9:25 PM]: ahhhhhhh,
Roman....the supposedly calming veteran?
)(*&^%
[9:25 PM]: anyway
you look at it, its a slap in the face
)(*&^%
[9:26 PM]: Its
all messed
up. they even fired Sgt Nelson who
did nothing but write a letter in favor of Alsbrooks & Jeff. and he
gets whacked too
)(*&^%
[9:27 PM]: He
said Jeff and Ruston
were Hard workers and were always getting
intelligence
information from his office.. ie.. Doing their
Job.
Housnitch1
[9:27 PM]: FIRED?
)(*&^%p
[9:27 PM]: We're
so angry.
Morgan got away Scott free
Housnitch1
[9:27 PM]: he
was FIRED?
)(*&^%
[9:27 PM]: Fired
from Tact
)(*&^%
[9:27 PM]: which
is bad on your record
Housnitch1
[9:28 PM]: oh...ok.....i
think the word is MOVED?
)(*&^%
[9:28 PM]: sent
back to Patrol
)(*&^%
[9:28 PM]: its
a demotion
)(*&^%
[9:29 PM]: If
Morgan had used the Word Ni**er..
it would have
been the end of her.. but you can insult people by calling them a Faggot and
its
ok
)(*&^%
[9:29 PM]: which
is BS
)(*&^%
[9:29 PM]: there
is no room in the HOUSTON POLICE Dept
for this crap
Housnitch1
[9:29 PM]: yes
dear i know
)(*&^%
[9:30 PM]: and
the Chief is letting her off the hook..
)(*&^%
[9:30 PM]: We
did the right thing
)(*&^%
[9:30 PM]: what
worries a lot of us,
is these officers will take it out
on the Gay Community
)(*&^%
[9:31 PM]: its
policy now, you can f**K
with the Fags and
)(*&^%
[9:32 PM]: Call
gays
names, and
THIS
Dept doesn't
care.. they will take the
word of this adulterous female over the word of 4 good officers
)(*&^%
[9:32 PM]: This
is WRONG WRONG WRONG
Housnitch1
[9:33 PM]:
.DON'T
AGONIZE.....ORGANIZE!!!!!
)(*&^%
[9:33 PM]:
It has been a bad week for Us
)(*&^%
[9:33 PM]: We're
all
very sad for Garza.
)(*&^%
[9:34 PM]: he
is a good man
)(*&^%
[9:34 PM]: thanks
Housnitch
)(*&^%
[9:34 PM]: God
bless you
Housnitch1
[9:35 PM]: Lord
Child don't thank me yet
Housnitch1
[9:36 PM]: i
think we
should call on the gay
& lesbian political
caucus
)(*&^%
[9:36 PM]: they
need to know about this.. these officers are in
their
neighborhoods and they hate fags
)(*&^%
[9:36 PM]: and
the Chief
& the Dept
doesn't
care
)(*&^%
[9:37 PM]: good
night
..
thanks
for listening
Well, Boys & Girls, after this exchange, and the Chronicle full of depositions saying that the Chief had not maintained a control over the gang task force, or seen to it that
HPD
accused of rights violations / Records reveal warrantless searches in
drug investigations
With even former Police Chief Nuchia giving a sworn statement "acknowledged gang task-force officers were directed to "go to the line, into the gray area" in searches, seizures and arrests" Current Police Chief Bradford was informed on more than one occasion that there was a conflict in written policy & actual application.. Kim Ogg, former head of the Mayor's Gang Task Force : ."Ogg said the ineffective and conflicting HPD policies pose a danger to the community and to officers. "The risk is danger to the community," Ogg testified .
That Bradford has taken NO action to rectify these problems, is an action in it's self. By NOT doing something, he has condoned these activities.
That he has punished GOOD MEN, for doing what they are supposed to do in reporting harassment, based on sexual orientation, and done nothing more than give the higher ranking officers a slap on the hand, speaks volumes for his LACK of managerial style, and shows that he believes he is above having to keep the law.
ALL IAD outcomes, come before Bradford before they are handed down. HE alone decides punishment / disciplinary action. HE can also send back a sustained finding and have the IAD investigators CHANGE it. Don't believe it? Do you Citizens really think we have a FAIR system working for us? NOT under this Mayor. NOBODY is held accountable, and if someone should exercise their right to complain, or sustain a complaint against the WRONG person, then they are the ones targeted for disciplinary action .... and in many cases ... just thrown to the wolves.
A rather large file came to Housnitch. They are sworn court depositions. Sworn Testimony, under penalty of perjury by AID officers.
We did file a complaint with the OIG, but according to them .... Chief Bradford, even with a sworn complaint, can decide to hand back a sustained finding of perjury & have the IAD officers change it. Don't believe us? Click on that Icon down there....
DEPOSITION OF SERGEANT DENNIS SLATE, HPD IAD Investigator. Sworn
to under penalty of perjury. Sgt. Slate testifies under oath, that a female
Police Officer, and a male Civilian Police Employee, both testified to him that
they had committed perjury under oath.
my lieutenant came to my office.
38
1 Q. Lieutenant who?
2 A. Bill Lawrence, W. H. Lawrence.
3 He said, "You're working on the
4 Chapman case?"
5 I said, "Yes, I am."
6 He says, "I have been told to tell
7 you to stop."
8 I said, "What is the deal?" The
9 office of the chief of police is reviewing this
10 case.
11 Q. Did he tell you who told you to tell them
12 to stop?
13 A. No, but he came from the chief's office.
14 Q. Did you ask him to tell you?
15 A. He didn't have to say anything else. It
16 came from the office of the chief of police.
17 Q. Okay.
18 A. My lieutenant comes in and tells me the
19 chief of police says to stop. I have to stop.
20 Q. Ever happened to you before?
21 A. Never happened to me before.
22 Q. Is that irregular?
23 A. Very irregular.
24 Q. Highly irregular.
25 A. Highly irregular.
39
1 Q. So you stopped? Did that raise questions
2 in your mind?
3 A. Oh, yes.
A. Okay. So I put the case to the side
25 because I was being told that the chief's office was
1 reviewing the case........
but the perjury case, I do have
2 that. I have that one there is no ifs, ands or buts
3 about that. I do have perjury on this one. So they
4 looked at each other and they said, "Let's go," And
5 I said, "okay." So I went to complete the case.
Q. Do you recall the contents of the
8 synopsis?
9 A. Yes, I do.
10 Q. Do you recall whether or not he found that
11 Officer Sheri Chapman had violated the perjury
12 statute?
13 A. Yes, he did.
14 Q. What did he say about that?
15 A. That she was guilty of perjury......
2 A. If I had been found guilty of perjury, I
3 would have been fired from the Houston Police
4 Department.
5 Q. What did you just say?
6 A. If I would have been found guilty of
7 perjury they would have fired me from the police
8 department.
9 Q. Found guilty by who?
10 A. By the police department, if the
11 department had established that I perjured myself,
12 the Houston Police Department would fire me.
13 Q.
Did the department establish that Officer14 Sheri Chapman perjured herself?
15 A. Yes, they did.
16 Q. They didn't fire her, did they?
17 A. No, sir.
18 Q. In fact, they took no action against her
19 whatsoever, did they?
20 A. That's correct.
21 Q. Why was she treated differently than
22 anyone else?
23 A. I have no idea.
24 Q. Do you find that disturbing?
25 A. Yes, I do.....
14 ...... the chief himself Chief Bradford would
15 have made that decision.
Not only did Sgt Slate wear to this, but also
25 this deposition, it seems to me, my interpretation.........
A. No, that's very distasteful.
5 Q. Why do you find it distasteful, officer?
6 A. Because I am a truthful and honest person.
7 I was out to do the job. I found the facts as I
8 have done it a hundred times in the cases I have
9 worked on and that politics or whatever, something
10 being handled in this case.
11 Q. And that's the first time you have ever
12 seen it in all the investigations that you made on
13 police officers --
14 A. Yes, sir.
15 Q. -- the first time?
16 A. My first time it ever happened to me.
17 Q. Have you ever heard of it ever happening
18 to anybody else?
19 A. Yes, sir, I have.
20 Q. Who?
21 A. I can't name the investigators, I just
22 know in certain cases it has political you -- you
23 know, like the Oregon shooting case, things like
24 that in Houston investigators --
25 Q. Have been directed by some higher
1 authority to find something or not find something?
2 A. Correct.
3 Q. That affects the integrity of your
4 division, IAD division, does it not?
5 A. Yes, it does.
6 Q. Are there going to be any repercussions
7 against you for giving me this deposition?
8 A. No, sir.
9 Q. Are you sure of that?
10 A. It won't come from my captain, and it
11 won't come from my lieutenant.
12 Q. Is there anything else you think would be
13 of interest to me that we haven't visited about?
14 A. One of the other things that after I put
15 this whole case together, I contacted the District
16 Attorney's office, Roberto Gutierrez.
17 Q. Roberto Gutierrez?
18 A. He's the part in charge of the political
19 integrity section and I sent him the packet, I said
20 please review this and see where we're at. And so a
21 little bit later on I talked to him about it and he
22 says, "Well, we don't have anything." And I said ,
23 "Well, you know, we have three depositions here.
24 This person is under oath and they lied. It's
25 perjury." He said, "Yes, but, you know, it involved
a marital situation." And so I explained to him a2 marital situation or what it doesn't really matter.
3 We have a person under oath. This is perjury.
1 Q. I don't mean to go into a civics lesson or
2 anything with you, but why do you feel that if you
3 perjured yourself -- well if you perjured yourself
4 in same manner about sex, do you think you would
5 have been terminated? I mean, not talking about an
6 officer perjuring themselves, about a crime scene
7 that they worked or about an investigation of the
8 Houston Police Department but a relatively personal
9 matter of who they had sex with, do you see the
10 difference between those two as for my question;
11 only for my question?
12 A. If you ask me once and I lied, if you
13 asked me once --
14 Q. Sir?
15 A. -- and I lied about that issue?
16 Q. Yes.
17 A. That may be one thing, but you ask me two
18 or three times and I consistently lie, lie, lie?
19 Q. What if I put you under oath.
20 A. Put me under oath, that's another thing.
21 The Houston Police Department, police officers are
22 based on truth. That's our job, our job is to tell
23 the truth. When you call a Houston Police Officer,
24 you expect that person to be honest and truthful.
25 That's one of the requirements of being a Houston
51 Police Officer, is being honest and truthful. So,
2 yes, when somebody's not truthful, it bothers me.
3 Q. What, if any, ramifications have you seen
4 out of the failure of -- first of all, let me ask
5 you this question:
Who would have made the decision6 whether to punish Officer Chapman, within the police
7 department?
8 A. Chief of Police.
9 Q. In his office?
10 A. His office.
You See Darlins......ONE MAN decides who gets prosecuted, who gets disciplined, who gets to continue who doesn't.....That's an awful lot of power for one man. With the recent discoveries by the courts concerning the Gang Task Force, this case, here & the general screwing of the Police officers who were just doing their job, Housnitch believes we have enough to call on the Department of Justice to come in & look at how our Police Department is being run.
If any of you police officers out there have any other information you'd like to share.....send it on babies, we have a P O Box, and I'll even come & pick it up. We NEVER divulge names....and hell, if it's in my P.O. Box, I never know who sends it anyway!!! We are also including a Lt. Watkins deposition for your viewing. He says the same thing ... ULTIMATELY, but if you want to see some himming & hawing...just click on that icon & have at it....it's long, it's tedious but it makes for great insight as to how our police department is being run..
Okay, Mayor, let's see.....The Police Department is being MIS-managed, the courts have found that minorities are being unduly targeted, a recent investigation into gay bashing, while sustained, has the Police Chief demoting...uh...excuse me, making "lateral" moves for all the officers who followed the rules & procedures & reported the gay bashing, yet nothing has happened to the female officer who uttered the slurs, and a slap on the wrist for her Capt's who were involved in the incident, and now we show you proof of and ADMITTED perjury by a female police officer & her male civilian lover, and NEITHER one of them were disciplined. We'd say "HOUSTON....WE HAVE A PROBLEM"
(since it is an election year guys.....let's see what the Mayor does)
The rest of you...get us some more information in here, with G W in the Whitehouse, we bet we'll see some results on a complaint to the DOJ.
![]()

![]()
IF Herb Lum, Showri Nandagiri, & Gary Ordat had listened to the first contractor & decided to replace the bridge as recommended....we wouldn't have lost so much time & money.
Ok, last issue we told you about that bridge over Cole Creek on Bingle road...this time we have some photos for you, and the excerpted report we gave ya'll last week is from Tamborello Engineering Consultants who say the bridge had past it's life span. They recommended it be replaced....that report was done in August 1999... Here's your pictures guys...
WOULD YOU DRIVE OVER THIS???? ALLOW A SCHOOL BUS OVER IT?
HERB LUM, SHOWRI NANDIGIRI, GARY ORADAT DOES
![]()
WE NEED YOUR HELP ... this page costs money to keep on-line help us keep it going WE NEED SOME DONATIONS!!!!!!!! ....
ANY DONATION WILL HELP.... PLEASE ......
P.O. Box 55423 Houston, Texas 77255
713-722-9258
![]()
(All
letters and e-mail correspondence become the property of HOUSNITCH and
housnitch.com. Unless otherwise expressly requested, we are entitled to publish
all such correspondence. We reserve the right to edit letters for length and
clarity, and for content that might get us sued, or to withhold their
publication. Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of our editors or
sponsors.)
![]()
| Subj: | BS and its cars |
| Date: | 1/28/01 11:49:46 AM Central Standard Time |
| From: To: Housnitch1@aol.com |
|
| Subj: | More BS on the bs department |
| Date: | 1/28/01 10:00:26 AM Central Standard Time |
| From: To: Housnitch1@aol.com |
|
| Subj: | BS |
| Date: | 1/25/01 9:54:41 PM Central Standard Time |
| From: To: Housnitch1@aol.com |
|
We had to attend the building services department state of the department
ceremony yesterday, Wednesday, January 24. This was my first real
opportunity to see Monique McGilbra be herself. Let me tell you, I was not
impressed! She is every bit as arrogant and contemptful as I had hear she
was. How a person with this type of abrasive, self-centered personality
could become the head of a city department is beyond me. It was all too
much for me when I heard her brag about all "her" accomplishments
during the past year. While she may envoke the term "we" or our
"team", she is really only speaking with any degree of respect about
herself. The only thing she has really accomplished is to get herself a
job making over $100,000 a year, a job for her husband making over $60,000 a
year, and jobs for her "friends", most of whom are also making over
$60,000 a year. Her dreams of glory are totally unto herself. It is
obvious she cares little for what's best for the city of houston and even less
for what's best for those of us in this department who were are not friends of
hers. She is fixed with the blind bureaucratic vision of creating an
empire by obtaining through any means available as many employees as possible.
I long for the day, and I know in my heart it will come eventually, when
Monique McGilbra and all her friends are told in no uncertain terms by someone
in charge who truly cares about the well-being of the city: it is time for
you to move on! I just hope I can hold out for the next couple of years.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO PUT UP WITH IT 2 MORE YEARS....LIKE WE KEEP SAYING....ANYBODY BUT BROWN IN 2001
| Subj: | bs |
| Date: | 1/23/01 2:05:14 PM Central Standard Time |
| From: To: Housnitch1@aol.com |
|
SOMEBODY HAS TOO, LET'S HOPE ENOUGH VOTER'S ARE !!!
FRED "ATSER" MARTINEZ IS SUPPOSE TO BE INSPECTING THOSE JOBS ... WELL, HE IS THE MAYOR'S FRIEND AND THEY APPEAR TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE RULES & REGULATIONS
Dear Snitch:
I have been an admiring fan of your site. I have
worked for COH/PWE for almost 17 years. I am worried
that the corruption in our city government will
ultimately result in our privatization. I am afraid
that the more bad publicity we get, we will ultimately
sign our own death warrant, by losing public support
for the low people on the totem pole, "US!" What our
top heavy government does reflects on all of us, even
the laborers. Our jobs, is what supports our
families, our necessities, our lives.
Although I can't seem to get enough of your site, it
does make me worried. The power of the pen and the
media are very powerful.
What are your thoughts? Please add me to your mailing
list. Thank you.
DARLIN WITH THE CURRENT CROP OF IDIOTS THE CITY HAS BEEN GIVING CONTRACTS TO, NOT A ONE OF THEM IS QUALIFIED TO HANDLE THE JOBS. AND IF TRUTH BE KNOWN...IT'S ONLY THESE SO CALLED "BOSSES" WHO SCREW STUFF UP!!! (and IF we were all that powerful, we'd have gotten rid of most of the people that we report on! There wouldn't be the 3 Stooges anymore)
![]()
Liberty alone demands for its realization the limitation of
the public authority, for liberty is the only object which benefits all alike,
and provokes no sincere opposition.
Lord Acton -circa 1862

tell em what you think darlins, we get tired of telling them by ourselves.......